Monday, January 12, 2009

Private Practice of scare mongering

I was watching the show Private Practice the other night with my daughter, and one of the story lines was about a woman with three children who had chosen not to immunize the younger two after her oldest contracted autism after receiving a shot.

Her middle child had picked up measles somewhere, and was very ill from it.  The pediatrician in the show, who up until this point had been respectful of her wishes not to immunize her other children, had turned rabid in the face of this situation, and was adamantly insisting that she protect her third child by giving him the shot.

The mother was beside herself with worry and grief, but the one thing she knew for sure was that her child had been happy and full of life, received the shot and was never the same again.  She knew, as only mothers can, what happened to that child, and she was damned if she was going to let it happen to her other two.

The one theme running throughout the show was the repeated statement by the actor doctors that immunizations do not cause autism.  They said this in such a scornful manner, that I was a little taken aback by this.  Because the truth of the matter is, there is no solid proof EITHER WAY that immunizations cause autism.  The only thing that there is are countless children with autism -- an epidemic of it, really -- and no answer as to why they have it now and not before now.  There are definitely parents who believe, without a shadow of a doubt, that their "normal" children changed after they had their shots.  

Of course this is not proof.  Parents are not experts, they certainly have no say in any of this.  Why should they?  They know nothing.  But doctors, well, if a doctor says that a shot won't cause autism, then so be it.

Has anyone ever read the fine print on a release form?  These immunizations can cause a whole host of reactions -- though they haven't and won't put autism on there.  The reasoning is that for every kid who has an adverse reaction to a shot, there are hundreds who do not.  Therefore, it is "safe."

As the show went on, I thought to myself that they better not have that kid die of measles.  Yes, I know you can die of measles, but you can die of flu, a sore throat and any host of things, depending on the state of your immune system.  My point is that there are people watching this show and getting a real dose of skewed information!  Despite the mother's pathetic (as they were portrayed) wailings about the state of her autistic son, the doctor was adamant that she was KILLING this one son, and could kill the other.  Did he use these words?  No.  But he had to take the situation into his own hands, and he walked right past the mother and gave her child a shot.

Are you kidding me?  You have to sign release forms for a reason!  Oh, but this is television, right?

So, my daughter, who is 15 and knows she will never be an experiment for the HPV (Gardisal) vaccine against cervical cancer, was confused.  And I was disgusted.  Since when do we use mainstream TV to promote agendas?  Even Boston Legal, which spoofed on current issues, did so in such an extreme manner that there was very little one could get upset about, no matter which side of the fence they sat.

But to kill a child on TV to make a point, all the while having the doctors scorn the mother's decision, making brazen comments like "vaccines are safe," without any facts whatsoever.  And then killing off the child to make the mother look like a monster?

Back in the day, the Partridge Family wouldn't have killed off anyone just to promote an agenda.  The Brady's were a happy, healthy lot.  Heck, we don't know if they even went to the doctor.  But now all we can watch on TV are medical-based shows, lawyer-based shows and that last scourge upon society:  REALITY Tv.

One can only hope that people are intelligent enough to realize that the corporate-driven television stations who are sleeping with big pharma are creating story lines to get into your head and create a whole new vision for you.

Just spit it out -- it leaves a bad taste in the mouth -- kind of like thermerosol -- you know, the preservative in vaccines that doesn't affect infants.  Hell, we were born to store mercury in our cells.


5 comments:

Anonymous said...

You know, I just watched this last night and I have to say I almost hope he does get sued for giving that kid the shot.

The mother was being completely legitamate in my eyes not wanting to risk her two younger kids after what happened to her first. The doctor has no right to think he knows better. Not like she probably wasn't beating herself up once the kid died anyway! Way to just worsen the blow.

Lisa said...

Of course she was. The thing about mother's intuition is that it trumps everything else. A mother does not make wild and crazy decisions to amuse herself.

The problem with today's society is that there are too many venues that would side with the doctor and claim that she was abusing her child.

The loss of our rights is the scariest thing we have going. BE VIGILANT AT ALL TIMES!

It Rhymes With Witch said...

Hey Lisa, found you through Tomasen .. I was in that class at KRHS and we've reconnected through facebook.

I have a son with autism. He is my fourth child. Do I think vaccines caused his autism? No. I think the mercury in shots I received triggered something lying dormant in him that's possibly genetic (his uncle has Aspergers and his grandfather likely did to).

Regarding 'my' shots. I am A negative. Dad is A positive. Because of this, I received the Rhogam shot in my 7th month of each pregnancy as well as immediately following delivery of each child.

Guess what's in rhogam? Mercury. And lots of it. So when Garrison as in utero, i received my SEVENTH shot of rhogam. All that mercury is floating around in me and I believe crossed over to him.

What's most telling? We've been doing some chelating (pulling the metals out of him) and he's responding.

I could talk about this for days. Thank you for posting this. I didn't see this show and am glad because I would have flipped the hell out.

Lisa said...

Thanks Hestia for your comments. That is very interesting, and the one thing that we all know for sure is that it is caused by SOMETHING.

And it is parents like you that will ultimately end up making the difference.

It Rhymes With Witch said...

The one thing everyone seems to agree on is that it DOES have a genetic component ... why else would boys have it more than girls by a ratio of 4 to 1?

Alison Tepper Singer, of Autism Speaks, just stepped down as she's in disagreement with them funding research to see if vaccines are causing autism. Good riddance .. she's an idiot and she was chair of communications .. NOT science.

:)